Don’t dilute the brand of ‘Judge’—New Law Journal

John Gould, Senior partner in the Russell-Cooke Solicitors, regulation and compliance team.
John Gould
1 min Read

Chair John Gould has contributed an article to the New Law Journal in which he argues that undermining the judicial title erodes public trust in the administration of justice. John expresses concern over retired judges who, when speaking beyond their realm of expertise, use their former judicial status to add undue weight to their opinions. He also raises issues about institutions like the Sikh court, which, though offering mediation and arbitration, adopts the language and appearance of English courts, which could potentially lead to public confusion.

When, however, their previous status is used to give authority to views largely unrelated to their judicial experience, their views are likely to damage the perception of those who actually hold offices and raise the possibility that beneath the serene surface, those sitting judges hold partisan views and opinions.
John Gould, Senior partner in the Russell-Cooke Solicitors, regulation and compliance team.
John Gould • Chair
|

The full article is available to read online from New Law Journal.

Get in touch

If you would like to speak with a member of the team you can contact our regulation and public law solicitors by email, by telephone on +44 (0)20 3826 7524 or complete our enquiry form.

In the press Regulation and public law New Law Journal judicial title brand 'Judge' public trust administration of justice John Gould